Archive for the ‘Interviews’ Category
10 Essential SEO Interviews
Last Updated on Monday, 16 August 2010 05:34 Written by Lee Odden Monday, 16 August 2010 05:34
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
I started interviewing people in the search marketing industry long ago (inspired by Aaron Wall) as a way to provide access to search marketing practitioners, pundits and employees at search engines. Beginning in 2005 with this interview with Brett Tabke from WebmasterWorld & Pubcon, interviews with search marketing types have been posted here covering a variety of search marketing topics.
The search engine marketing industry changes often, so it’s pretty interesting to see some of the predictions made in some of those older interviews. Below are 10 more recent SEO interviews from client side practitioners or search engine employees that you can get a lot of value from in terms of understanding how facilitating SEO works in organizations, SEO and social media, resources, tools and specific SEO tips.

Vanessa Fox – Ex Googler, now at Nine by Blue on Marketing in the Age of Google

Matt Evans of Monster.com on Agency vs. In-House SEO

Michael Nguyen of Shopzilla & Bizrate.com on Huge Ecommerce Website SEO

Scott Skurnick of Edmunds.com on Enterprise SEO

Dan Perry, SEO Director at Turner Broadcasting on Big Brand Publisher SEO

Tim Ash of SiteTuners on Landing Page Optimization

Alex Bennert, Chief Search Strategist at The Wall Street Journal on Very Large Website & Publisher SEO

Maile Ohye, Developer Programs Tech Lead at Google on Google Webmaster Central

Laura Lippay – Recently left Yahoo for Nine by Blue on SEO at a Search Engine

Todd Malicoat – Consultant and Faculty at Market Motive on the Search Marketing Industry
Other interviews worth mentioning, albeit a bit older, include: Danny Sullivan, Tim Mayer, Mike Grehan, Matt Cutts, Andy Beal, Melanie Mitchell, Adam Lasnik, Jill Whalen, Eric Ward, Heather Lloyd-Martin, Andy Atkins-Kruger, Adam Audette, Neil Patel.
Be sure to watch TopRank’s YouTube channel for video interviews with search and internet marketers that we’ll capture during the SES San Francisco conference this week.
![]()
Gain a competitive advantage by subscribing to the
TopRank® Online Marketing Newsletter.
© Online Marketing Blog, 2010. |
10 Essential SEO Interviews | http://www.toprankblog.com
Posted under Interviews, News | 1 Comment
CMO Cowboy: Jeffrey Hayzlett on Social Media, ROI & SES San Francisco
Last Updated on Wednesday, 11 August 2010 06:00 Written by Lee Odden Wednesday, 11 August 2010 06:00
Jeffrey Hayzlett is the former CMO at Kodak and author of “The Mirror Test: Is Your Business Really Breathing?”. You might have seen him on Celebrity Apprentice with Donald Trump or speaking at a variety of industry conferences. He hails from South Dakota and considers himself a cowboy. Unfortunately, I couldn’t find any photos of him online with a cowboy hat.
I connected with Jeff yesterday morning to talk about his success with social media, corporate change, Kodak, ROI and his upcoming keynote presentation at SES San Francisco.
Jeff, it was great to finally “meet you” on the Beancast recently and thank you for inspiring the idea behind a pretty popular blog post “Why Do So Many Companies Suck at Social Media” which has had well over 1,100 retweets and multiples of that in page views.
Why do you think companies are having a hard time with social media?
I think most companies just don’t understand it. There are some fundamental conflicts that they have. The biggest piece about social media is listening. That’s it. It’s listening to customers. A lot of companies just don’t get it.
Companies have outsourced everything. They’re outsourcing their contacts with their customers, which quite frankly, I don’t get. My own company that I worked for had done the same thing. I didn’t appreciate that, didn’t like that and didn’t like the way in which we did it. Those decisions weren’t necessarily mine, but I tried to impact those decisions.
I think a lot of companies really suck at this social media stuff because they don’t get the listening part. They’re afraid. Therefore, when they become afraid, they’re a little worried about giving up control. That’s what they think they’re doing with social media.
The thing is, they never had control to begin with. The customers always had control. That’s the way it’s always been. As these companies start to enter into this, they’re just not very good at listening and you have to get good at listening first.
It’s a mind shift isn’t it?
It is a mind shift. Either you’ve “got it or you don’t”. Eventually I think they can get it. I think one third of the companies will get it right away, about one third will eventually get it and about one third will never get it.
It sounds similar to leadership. Some people have it, some people can learn it and some people never will.
I think confidence is another word to use. Are you confident in what you do and how you do it?.
You’ve been called a Celebrity CMO by Forbes Magazine and I think it’s fair to say you’re a great example of a senior marketing leader that “walks the talk” when it comes to social media: personally, what you’ve done at Kodak and in promoting your book, “The Mirror Test”. What advice do you have for other business and marketing leaders who are deciding their own level of engagement on the social web?
I think the most important thing is just to be genuine, be real. Social media is a very transparent thing, so you can’t fake it. I am who I am and I don’t try to be anything else. I don’t try to change my tweets or do things diferently than what you see on Facebook. It’s me, it’s who I am.
Yesterday I was talking to some folks from Kareem Abdul Jabbar about an upcoming project and I said, how cool is this? My job: I’m talking to Kareem Abdul Jabbar! I grew up watching this guy and the Lakers.
I think about things like that and who I am. I think most people who are in this game, who are really good, besides the “celebrity” portion of it, a lot of folks are and that helps them to gain notoriety. But the guys who are really good at it are the people who share, who are open and genuine. You get a good sense of who they are and I think that’s very helpful. That’s who I am.
My team members will tell you, you’ll never have to second guess me when it comes to something, because I’m going to tell you exactly what I’m thinking whether it’s right or wrong. Sometimes I even say things that are incorrect, politically or just downright wrong, because I don’t know what I don’t know. But I’m also willing to say, “I don’t know. Or wow, let’s go back and change that.”
How much of a change agent do large corporate marketers need to be in order to get their companies to see the value of social web participation?
Regardless of the social web, I think marketing’s job, and the head of marketing more than anybody, is to cause tension in the organization. My former CEO said that was my main job. When he explained that to me, it made a lot of sense and I’ve really taken up that mantra. That was my job at Kodak and it led me to be the big change agent in the company, which is what I was hired to do.
Everybody else had to be change agents as well. A big part of what I was supposed to do was cause that change and tension. I think for leaders reading this, you’re job is not unlike that of a marketer, to put a little tension in between organizations, between old ideas and new ideas. Because from that tension you get a lot of good things.
There’s an old saying in sports, “No pain, no gain.” I think the same thing holds true here in business. You don’t want the pain, but you want the tension. That’s what brings about better decisions and better actions.
The blogging done by Kodak with Jenny Cisney and team has been cited as a best practice by numerous publications, bloggers and as an example at conferences. Do you think most companies should blog?
Yes, absolutely. I think they should blog. The key thing is, “who” should blog? We named the very first Chief Blogger ever. We also named the first Chief Listener as part of our social media team.
A lot of people thought I had a lot of input into the blog, what we did, how we said it and direction, but I didn’t. I setup a Blog Communications Council. My head of communications headed it up as the publisher, pretty much like a newspaper model. Jenny as chief blogger became the chief editor and she coordinated all the other bloggers that worked for her kind of like reporters.
That’s the only structure I wanted to see happen around it, plus the mood and theme. Outside of that, I never saw a blog post until after it was published. I allowed my teams to go with the way they wanted to go, except for a few times when linking out to something risque. We still referenced it, but took the link down. We did things like that to respect the values of our employees.
A lot of companies make big mistakes and say, “I think the CEO is the one that should blog for us”. I think that’s the last person I’d want to talk to mostly in the company, because they’re usually not that exciting.
You want to think about who you want to have blogging and they way you want to do it. In fact, Kodak has a great social media policy book that’s out on how to get into all this. It’s free on their website at: Kodak Social Media Tips (pdf).
How do you define success with social activities like blogging?
You can talk about how many people refer back, visitors and so on. I’m not so interested in the eyeballs and ears. I’m more concerned about participating with hearts and minds. So building out a community that really likes you.
You can syndicate out blog content and drive more attention because ultimately you want more people to take a look at you and get a sense of who you are.
We wanted to be uplifting and helpful to our customers with hints, tips and things like that. Reflect our culture and the mood of our company and also represent our product very well. We also wanted to blog for our employees which is a big part of our community. I think employees look at your blog as much as anybody else.
There’s a lot of companies looking at social activities, blogging included. They’re considering measures of success and it makes sense, you had a goal of better engaging with customers, telling your story and connecting with employees. Obviously metrics would follow along those goals.
I think blogs should be an extension of you, not necessarily the official mouthpiece. I think blogs should reflect your personality more than the corporate position on this or that. People will appreciate that more.
The acronym ROI means something different for you (Return on Ignore) can you elaborate on that? How do you answer the Return on Investment question with large company social media efforts?
There are three types of Return on Investment I’m measuring all the time:
- Increase in sales
- Increase in margin
- Increase in customer satisfaction
Those are the three most important ROI things I’ve got to deliver and concentrate on the most. The rest of it’s just keeping track of stuff.
I said the “Return on Ignore” statement in a way to cause tension, which is what I’m known for. We spend so much time trying to measure the things we’re doing rather than the real things which is about listening to our customers.
I can’t say enough how important it is to listen to your customers because its about capturing customer behaviors that drives your sales, margins and satisfaction.
Those are the things that are the most important. How about paying attention to your customers more and less about what percentage of the customers we’re reaching at any particular time and micromanaging down to the nit on every single email campaign or whatever. People spend a lot more time than they need to on trying to figure out ROI. They want to put a dollar amount on everything you do to measure it and you can’t do it. You’ll spend your entire career and never get it done.
Your book, the Mirror Test is doing well and has the endorsement of people like Donald Trump and Christie Hefner. Can you share more about the 3 tests you talk about in the book?
There are a lot of tests in the book , but the three main themes of tests are:
Look in the mirror – Are you breathing? Does the dog eat the dog food? Does the idea that you have warrant merit? Will it breathe? Will it fog the mirror? There’s that piece of it we have to ask ourselves because passion alone is not a substitute for good planning and proper steps in terms of marketing and having a great business idea.
Looking in the mirror at yourself - Do I have what it takes? Do my people have what it takes? Looking around the business itself and does it look like a winner. Because sometimes we get caught in a rut and you need to walk into HQ once in a while and change it up.
Bottome line: Am I making money? – This is the most important one. Because in the end, it’s about generating profit. Ultimately that’s what businesses are supposed to be doing so you can do everything else you want to do in your life whether it’s personally or invest back into the business.
My conditions for satisfaction and success are: Grow wealth for my family, grow professionally and have fun doing it.
It was time for me to leave at Kodak because I had done what I was supposed to do and completed it. Now it’s time for me to go on to the next chapter and do something else. I stayed at Kodak for 4 years and 1 month. That’s the longest I’ve ever stayed anywhere and a lot longer than most CMOs out there. It was time for me to move on. Those are my personal tests myself, that I must be able to live up to.
A lot of people have said, “Why would you leave Kodak?”. You’ve got corporate jets, you’ve got this you’ve got that, and it was a great kind of a gig. I’m so grateful and I love the company. It was time for Jeff Hayzlett to do something different.
“Adapt or die” is a strong theme of the book. Those words are easier said than implemented. What advice do you have for tradition-rich organizations to see the value of change?
I think that should be part of their mantra and part of their DNA. A company like Kodak forgot that it was an innovative company. It forgot that it had 25,000 patents in the world. It forgot that it was inventing things. It forgot it took materials science and imaging science and put them together and created unbelieveable products. It started thinking of itself only as a film company.
What that did is contain itself in a little yellow box. And it was much bigger than the yellow box. What they needed was some people from the outside to remind them, no you’re really about creating the box, creating new boxes and creating things that go inside the box. That’s what you’re about.
You create emotional technology that helps people to make, manage and move images and information. That’s what you do. You’re not a film company, not a camera company and not commercial printing company. You’re an innovative company that creates emotional technology.
So, now what does that open up for you? It opens your horizons to a whole different way of thinking.
You’ll be keynoting at SES San Francisco in a few weeks. Can you give us a little preview of what you’ll be talking about?
Well, it’s going to be exciting, first of all! There’s no telling what I’m going to be talking about at this particular event because I’m always different everywhere I go.
I will be talking about transformation and change and how search engine optimization and search engine strategies fit in to that. And how you’ve got to be thinking about that as you put together everything you do.
I don’t think it’s always at the forefront of everyone’s thoughts. For marketers, for the most part it’s an afterthought, not a forethought. So imagine redesigning your sites in different ways to make sure your optimization and being searchable is better as you put things together.
So it’s going to be talking about strategy. It’s about the use of strategy and how you come up with products and services and offer them up on the web to get you noticed more. That’s going to be key, especially as we move more into video. Beyond that, is, what is this industry going to be doing around mobile?
Lee: We’re really looking forward to it.
It’s going to be a blast, it’s a great crowd, a great conference. It’s one that I’ve been wanting to do for a long time and they finally got around to calling me
At SES I’m moderating a panel called “Selling Search Marketing to the C-Suite”. Can you share a tip that I might include in the presentation that helps internal marketers do a better job of communicating the value of search marketing to business leaders?
Two things. One, I write about this in my book The Mirror Test, ways how to reach C-Level executives. I always find it interesting, people say, “I’d really like to meet with you” and so I say, “OK, so call me”.
I will tell you that the higher you get up in the organization, the lonelier it is. Even though you’re busy busy busy. Before 8 and after 5, I answer my own phones and it’s amazing who calls and who doesn’t call. And that there are people who want to reach you, but never reach out to you.
The biggest thing I’d tell you is what’s your elevator pitch? I redefine the elevator pitch in the book, The Mirror Test. It’s probably one of the biggest concepts that’s come out of the book, called the 118. And what I mean by that is 8 seconds is the average attention span of an adult. I know it to be true because I looked it up on the internet
.
And then 110 seconds is the average elevator ride in New York City from the time you press the button, step on the elevator, ride up or ride down and get off. So that’s what you have to pitch me.
You have 8 seconds to hook me to get that lean-in factor, so that I want to pay attention to you. And then 110 seconds to close me.
In that 110 seconds, don’t tell me who you work with, because I could care less. Talk to me about the value you’re going to create for me, the pain points you’re going to solve. What is your unique selling proposition that stands out above everybody else. Otherwise, don’t talk to me, don’t waste my time.
I want to hear in 118 seconds or less, what you’re specifically going to do for my company. And don’t give me some generic crap that you would give to somebody else. I want you to do your homework. I want you to look at my company, find out about me and show me.
Imagine if you walked up to me and said, “I did a profile on your company and I can show you 3 ways that will add $X to your bottom line if you implement one tool. Would you be interested?”
Well, man if I head a pitch like that, it’s going to make me pay attention. It means you’ve done your homework, you’ve researched me. You’ve invested in me and gone out of your way to prepare a presentation that shows I’m not doing it as good as I could. And if I used you, I could gain. You gain, I gain. That’s a pretty good deal. I’ll guarantee you most people will not come up with that kind of approach.
Thanks Jeff!
You can see Jeff give a keynote presentation at the upcoming Search Engine Strategies conference in San Francisco on Tuesday, August 17th at 9am. You can find out more about Jeff’s book The Mirror Test and his CEO Network on his website. You can also find him on Twitter.
![]()
Gain a competitive advantage by subscribing to the
TopRank® Online Marketing Newsletter.
© Online Marketing Blog, 2010. |
CMO Cowboy: Jeffrey Hayzlett on Social Media, ROI & SES San Francisco | http://www.toprankblog.com
Posted under Interviews, News | 1 Comment
Video: Marketing Lessons From the Grateful Dead
Last Updated on Friday, 16 July 2010 06:30 Written by Lee Odden Friday, 16 July 2010 06:30
Sometimes we learn best about doing things in new and innovative ways by understanding them in terms of something we already know. Stories provide useful context and perspective and that’s exactly what David Meerman Scott has done with his latest book that’s just been announced: “Marketing Lessons from the Grateful Dead: What Every Business Can Learn from the Most Iconic Band in History“.
A longtime fan of the Dead, David co-wrote the book with HubSpot co-founder and fellow deadhead, Brian Halligan to share the brilliant innovations the Dead brought to the business of marketing music and building an incredibly passionate community of brand enthusiasts.
While we were both speaking at the Vocus User’s conference in Washington D.C. last month, David took a few minutes with me to do the following video interview on his new book:
Here’s a summary of the book and the lessons we can all learn about marketing, social media principles and thinking outside the “rules” of business as usual:
“The Grateful Dead broke almost every rule in the music industry book. They encouraged their fans to record shows and trade tapes; they built a mailing list and sold concert tickets directly to fans; and they built their business model on live concerts, not album sales. By cultivating a dedicated, active community, collaborating with their audience to co-create the Deadhead lifestyle, and giving away “freemium” content, the Dead pioneered many social media and inbound marketing concepts successfully used by businesses across all industries today.”
The book can be ordered on Amazon.
![]()
Gain a competitive advantage by subscribing to the
TopRank® Online Marketing Newsletter.
© Online Marketing Blog, 2010. |
Video: Marketing Lessons From the Grateful Dead | http://www.toprankblog.com
Posted under Interviews, News | 2 Comments
Tell All Q&A With Google’s Maile Ohye – SES Toronto Keynote
Last Updated on Tuesday, 6 July 2010 12:22 Written by Adam Singer Friday, 11 June 2010 08:31
Maile Ohye, Senior Developer Programs Engineer, Google delivered the morning keynote on day two of Search Engine Strategies Toronto. Maile discussed Google’s approach to helping site owners and shared answers to burning questions from the moderator and audience.
The format was a Q&A, and the following is a summary of the best questions and answers from the session.
How did you get to Google?
I studied computer science/artificial intelligence in college. From that point on, I went into information retrieval and then joined the department of defense. Then I took some time off, and eventually joined Google. I’ve now been at Google for 5 years.
After a previous update, we heard a story of someone ranking #1 who lost positioning (and was previously making $10,000/month just from that one ranking). The same thing again seems to be happening with the Mayday update. What exactly is that it?
We tweak little things in our algorithm all the time. Mayday was a significant update that really impacted long tail terms. A lot of people were leveraging long tail phrases for lots of traffic but it was frequently done via automated methods. We’ve looked to eliminate spam, and that’s been a big priority for us. At the same time, there were people developing not quality content (not a violation of guidelines, but also not providing value). What it does is for long tail queries, is we now just consider them queries like anything else. We are going to put as much value in those search results as all search results.
So, you can’t just add a bunch of keywords on a page and expect results just on that. This type of update is continuing and it’s a focus we have. We have other projects too to help continue making long tail traffic highly relevant.
Are you saying with long tail terms, are queries getting longer?
Yes, people have evolved as searchers. With Google when you search for over 3 terms, the snippet link increases in importance as people expect to find long queries and we want to deliver a better experience.
What’s the difference between Mayday and Caffeine?
Mayday is a pure ranking change – just looking to make the results more relevant. Caffeine is a huge infrastructure change. It’s the idea that we can now take our entire index and update it a document at a time. It gives us the scalability we didn’t have before – now we have the ability to grow even bigger and better. On top of which, caffeine is really cool because we can attach more meta data to each document. We have all these ways to push a document out faster and get it to users quicker.
Can you talk about snippets for a second? How do I decide what comes up in a snippet?
For most people, when you design a document you’re not thinking about what a snippet is going to look like in your document. What we take for the snippet is the context of the keyword in the snippet. The other place we look is in your meta description. If you put your keyword in your meta description it’s a good idea as then you have control over your snippet. The reason we used the meta description is it’s one of the few areas that people weren’t spamming. We do want to give webmasters an option.
Is there a specific way people should think about creating a document?
Overall there is a strategy you need to have with your site. What type of users do you want to attract, and what is your call to action? And so your pages should be designed with that intention. Think about your content and lay it out in a way that converts. Titles are important for search engines and semantic markup is still good. Mayday took out information that was auto-generated or not relevant. Design each page with an intention of what you want from users.
So there’s a big shift in the SEO world. Everyone was always focused on keywords/ranking algorithms. Now everyone thinks about social. Where does social fit within search?
There’s a way search is evolving, and when it comes to personalization we want to deliver results that are more and more unique. That’s where social search comes in for us – it’s expanding a theme we really want to pursue. For social search it comes from the social graph of the web layered on top of the link graph. But prioritize by having a great website first, then get involved in social media.
What are your thoughts on getting better links to your website?
When you create a site, unique and compelling products or services content is what matters most. How can you make yours different from all the other sites on the web? Your customers will link to you when they think it’s great and that will happen naturally. But, you can also look for opportunities for links too – not just by emailing a webmaster asking for links but expanding in the same way you’d expand your business. I.E., forging partnerships and adding value to others.
Links are a big part of our PageRank algorithm which is a major component on the 100’s of items in it. Links are not just based on quantity but more so on quality. We know on a link by link basis what is valuable to what and we value them all differently. It is done algorithmically and we also have a manual spam-fighting team. Just because you have a lot of links doesn’t necessarily mean you are getting value. Look for quality links not quantity.
Am I better off looking in webmaster tools for data than a third party tool?
Our mission with webmaster tools is to support webmasters within the Google ecosystem. Our data is only relevant to Google, not all the search engines. Our goal is to keep the ecosystem thriving. It’s about helping webmasters regardless of the size of their pocketbook. It’s at no cost to you. There are other tools out there, which you should explore too if you like since our tool is just relevant to Google.
Why was site speed recently highlighted as important?
The site speed update was purely from our user metrics – we know people like faster performance. We find that even when slowing results by half a second, they were actually searching less. When we removed the delay, they went back up but never to the same level (this was actually a costly experiment). This was just due to latency. We also found in tests that conversions will increase with sites that load quicker – it’s a very important aspect of your website. Faster sites can potentially outrank you.
Talk to us about Flash – is it really search friendly?
If you have a flash site, don’t expect Google to crawl it perfectly – or other search engines too. It’s just not as accessible. We’re working actively on Flash but it’s not perfect yet.
What about microsites? Are they a good idea?
Microsites were originally created to dominate search results. It was originally kind of a spammy technique. I normally don’t suggest it, Mayday and future updates are only looking for quality sites. If you want to dominate search results, you can do things like add videos/images and other data. Microsites confuse users, there are links coming in to another site that isn’t your main site, and they are hard to maintain as now you have multiple sites. It’s a jarring user experience; I don’t think they are going to work in search results in the future as they did in the past.
What about for e-commerce sites that are extremely large with lots of products? We’ve seen sites with fewer items and more information on each product outranking us.
That’s what we would expect from Mayday. Users don’t care if your site has many items, they care about descriptive content. They don’t want to see content that is just a title and an image. It comes down to creating unique content on each page. We crawl what we want to keep in the index and we keep in the index what users want to see in the search results. The drop off you are noticing is because we are focusing on content-rich pages and less on sites that are just tons of pages without value. If you link content up and bring the link structure up, we’ll crawl that more often. But at the end of the day, more content matters.
![]()
Gain a competitive advantage by subscribing to the
TopRank® Online Marketing Newsletter.
© Online Marketing Blog, 2010. |
Tell All Q&A With Google’s Maile Ohye – SES Toronto Keynote | http://www.toprankblog.com
Posted under Interviews, News, Search Engine Optimization | No Comments
Newsletter
Categories
- Article Marketing
- Facebook Marketing
- Internet Marketing
- Interviews
- Keyword Research
- Link Building
- Make Money Blogging
- Marketing With Twitter
- Microblogging
- Monetization Strategies
- News
- Persuasion Tactics
- RSS Bookmarking
- Search Engine Marketing
- Search Engine Optimization
- Social Bookmarking
- Social Media Marketing
- Social Media Monitoring

